"BW" > wrote in message
...
> You're just boring with that yEnc
> :o[

Not only that, most people don't even bother looking at what are probably
some very good pictures. It just isn't worth the bother.
--
Jim in NC

On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:08:19 +0200, "BW" >
wrote:

>You're just boring with that yEnc
>:o[
>> =yend size=74465 crc32=8581e9f6

Which, ironically, by not trimming your reply you are now guilty of
posting... X^}

On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:08:19 +0200, "BW" >
wrote:

>You're just boring with that yEnc
>:o[
>> =yend size=74465 crc32=8581e9f6

Which, ironically, by not trimming your reply you are now guilty of
posting... X^}

"Morgans" > wrote in
:

>
> "BW" > wrote in message
> ...
>> You're just boring with that yEnc
>> :o[
>
> Not only that, most people don't even bother looking at what are
> probably some very good pictures. It just isn't worth the bother.


IHMO:
No bother , just use a proper newsreader, then, its no hassle at all..

I, myself do not post in yEnc, but I have other real things to bother
me, other than a minor issue such as this... Xnews works , try it...


Course I was reading USENET back when you had to use UUdecode to see any
pictures at all.. and FTP or GOPHER the images, back before Al Gore
"Invented" the internet...
:-)

On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 06:08:19 -0400, BW wrote
(in article >):

> You're just boring with that yEnc

You really should get a real newsreader.

On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:36:19 -0400, Morgans wrote
(in article >):

>
> "BW" > wrote in message
> ...
>> You're just boring with that yEnc
>>> o[
>
> Not only that, most people don't even bother looking at what are probably
> some very good pictures. It just isn't worth the bother.
>

Those who have real newsreaders don't even notice how a binary is encoded,
their newsreaders handle it automatically.